
Here is my PhotoShop Lab assignment!
Thanks Dominick!
One of the principles mentioned in the Doge article that I feel Hilary and I implemented in our WebQuest successfully was organizing people. In our WWI WebQuest we grouped students together in teams of four. We then had these groups break up questions on a specific technology used in this war and research them on their own. Once the research was complete the group met together and shared their research. They were to make sure that everyone in their group could explain all of the answers well. We then broke up the students into new groups where they joined ‘experts’ who had studied different subjects. The goal of each student was to convince those in their group that their technology was the most important.
I think that this strategy enhanced our WebQuest because it added an element of competition and allowed students to work with many different students. It also allowed the students to use higher level thinking as the researched and formulated an argument backing their research. As the article mentioned it also allowed for positive interdependence, and group accountability. To improve upon this in the future we might decide to base the research on pair work instead of independent research.
The Harris article brought to light some great ideas of incorporating Internet projects in the classroom. Unfortunately, I do not believe that these learning projects are prevalent in today’s classrooms. All classes that I’ve ever observed or heard about (from my 15 year old daughter) are sadly lacking when it comes to integrating technology into their lesson plans.
I believe that there are many reasons as to why teachers do not use these internet supported classroom strategies. Some educators may not realize that these types of possibilities exist. Others may feel that these activities take too much time and effort. Yet another reason that teachers do not incorporate these strategies into their classrooms may be that they lack this type of access to computers. Most classrooms do not house computers and their may be time constraints on access to computer labs. Furthermore, not all students have computers in their home.
However I do not feel that these reasons are good enough to exclude many of the ideas in this article. I believe that if teachers consciously make an effort to overcome obstacles in incorporating internet learning ideas such as information searches, global challenges, tele-field-trips, and other internet ideas that they will! Maybe it means being creative with computer lab time or raising money for computers through local businesses (even having older models donated to the classroom), or increasing know-how of what methods there are….where there’s a will there’s a way. Students deserve to have more hands on opportunities with technology in their classrooms!
Some of the behaviors of effective classroom managers as described in the
The Barron article mentioned many benefits that come from using technology in education. I thought that one of the most powerful was improving motivation in the classroom! I believe that students appreciate a good challenge and what better way than presenting course work through technology that draws on student strengths but also causes them to stretch. When students are given an assignment that asks to integrate technology they may feel that the work is fun, interesting, stimulating and relevant. When a student feels motivated, feelings of self esteem and confidence also increase. I
I also liked how the article discussed ways that technology boost communication skills. What a wonderful idea to connect students from different countries via email. I think that his idea would definitely help students with relationship, analytical, and writing skills. A student writing an email might not notice that he or she is improving in communication! I also think that teaching students to use power points, excel, and other programs would also help them in communication skills as they learn further how to present relevant points and ideas.